Current+event+2

[]  So pretty much this article talked about the contreversey about how the death penalty its taking it's toll on the economy, and either its time to go of not because it's true, for example 2 people can committed the same crime but both get different punishments, that's such BS that makes absolutely no sense, and supposibly it's pretty expensive to kill a person , which I don't doubt it because not a whole lot accrue

I found out that the death penalty is way more expensive than life in prison, and they're arent much financial resources. The question is whether the death penalty is a good use of resources that could be used to more effectively to prevent and reduce crime. You might already know, but homicide rates and rates of violent crime are higher in states with the death penalty than in those without it.

In what way is the death penalty more expensive?? • more pre-trial time will be needed to prepare: cases typically take a year to come to trial • twice as many attorneys will be appointed for the defense • two trials instead of one will be conducted: one for guilt and one for punishment • the trial will be longer